Key result
Detailed angiographic assessment of the coronary sinus and its tributary veins provides crucial anatomical pathways for optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy and emerging ablation strategies.
Why the study?
Recent electrophysiology advances require detailed angiographic assessment of cardiac veins beyond classical CRT targets, but consensus regarding nomenclature and classification of these veins is lacking.
A detailed understanding of the angiographic anatomy of the left coronary veins is crucial for advancing epicardial arrhythmia mapping, ablation, and atypical cardiac pacing strategies.
Purpose of Review This review aims to synthesize current knowledge on the angiographic anatomy of the coronary sinus and its tributaries veins, with focus on venous branches other than classical ones used in cardiac resynchronization therapy. It also presents common anatomical aspects that could impact the clinical outcome. Recent Findings Recent advancements in the electrophysiology field, like epicardial arrhythmia mapping and ablation through coronary sinus or cardiac pacing from atypical veins requires a detailed angiographic assessment of cardiac veins. There is an increased interest for the veins coursing in the left ventricular summit (LVS) area and could potentially provide a pathway to reach the LVS arrhythmogenic foci. However, there is no consensus regarding the nomenclature and classification of these veins. Summary This review could offer a better understanding of the coronary sinus and its tributary veins distribution, dimensions and relationship with nearby structures that could help the development of new ablation and pacing tools and strategies, with higher success rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zehan et al. (2025) conducted a review in Coronary venous anatomy. Detailed angiographic assessment of the coronary sinus and its tributary veins provides crucial anatomical pathways for optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy and emerging ablation strategies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: