Key result
AV node ablation plus conduction system pacing improves LVEF ~12% in AF and HF.
Why the study?
No relevant systematic reviews had evaluated the efficacy of His-Purkinje conduction system pacing in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure who had undergone atrioventricular node ablation.
Does atrioventricular node ablation combined with His-Purkinje conduction system pacing improve LV function and clinical status in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=421)
Does atrioventricular node ablation combined with His-Purkinje conduction system pacing improve LV function and clinical status in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure?
Effect estimate: MD -11.89 (95% CI -13.41 to -10.37)
p-value: p=<0.01
AVNA combined with HPCSP significantly improves LV function and reduces the need for certain heart failure medications in patients with AF and heart failure.
Introduction As there are no relevant systematic reviews that evaluate the efficacy of His-Purkinje conduction system pacing (HPCSP) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with heart failure who have undergone atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA), we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of HPCSP after AVNA in such cases. Methods We searched the PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for studies on the impact of AVNA combined with HPCSP on patients with AF with heart failure published between 2000 and 2021. Review Manager 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. The clinical results evaluated included changes in left ventricular (LV) function, QRS duration, pacing threshold, and medication after surgery. Results The pooled results showed a significant difference in LV ejection fraction, LV end-diastolic dimension, New York Heart Association classification, and brain natriuretic peptide when baseline and follow-up values were compared (P < 0.01). The number of patients taking diuretics, β-blockers, and digoxin at baseline was significantly reduced at follow-up (P < 0.01). However, the number of patients taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors did not change significantly (P = 0.89). Regarding QRS duration, there was no significant difference between AVNA and HPCSP compared with before implementation (P = 0.05); however, an increasing trend was observed in the pacing threshold at follow-up compared with baseline (P < 0.01). Conclusion AVNA combined with HPCSP could significantly improve LV function at follow-up and reduce the administration of diuretics, β-blockers, and digoxin for patients with AF with heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
wang et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure (n=421). Atrioventricular node ablation combined with His-Purkinje conduction system pacing vs. Baseline was evaluated on Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD -11.89, 95% CI -13.41 to -10.37, p=<0.01). Atrioventricular node ablation combined with His-Purkinje conduction system pacing significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (MD -11.89) compared to baseline in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: