Key result
Azelnidipine significantly improved ejection fraction (42% vs 31%, P<0.05) and prevented left ventricular remodeling compared to untreated myocardial infarction in rats.
Why the study?
Does azelnidipine prevent left ventricular remodeling and improve cardiac function in rats after myocardial infarction?
Does azelnidipine prevent left ventricular remodeling and improve cardiac function in rats after myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 42% vs 31%
p-value: p=<0.05
In a rat model of myocardial infarction, azelnidipine prevented left ventricular remodeling and improved both systolic and diastolic function.
Hypothesis-generating in rat MI model; leaves open translation to human post-MI remodeling prevention.
Long-acting Ca(2+)-channel blockers have been reported to be effective in treating ischemic heart disease. However, their effects on cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI) are still unclear. We performed this study to examine the effect of azelnidipine on left ventricular (LV) remodeling, including systolic and diastolic dysfunction, in rats with MI. MI was induced by ligation of the left anterior descending artery. The rats were then separated into 3 groups: a sham-operated group (n = 9), untreated MI group (n = 10), and azelnidipine-treated MI group (n = 10). Four weeks after MI, hemodynamic measurements and Doppler echocardiographic assessment were performed. LV weight and LV end-diastolic dimension were significantly higher in the untreated MI group than in the sham-operated group. Azelnidipine significantly prevented the increases in these parameters. Azelnidipine also improved the ejection fraction (42 +/- 3%, P<0.05) and the E wave to A wave ratio (3.2 +/- 0.5, P<0.05), compared with the untreated MI group (31 +/- 3% and 5.3 +/- 0.8, respectively). In conclusion, azelnidipine can prevent LV remodeling and improve systolic and diastolic function after MI. Administration of long-acting Ca(2+)-channel blockers after MI is an effective strategy for treating MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishiya et al. (2007) studied Myocardial infarction (n=29). Azelnidipine vs. Untreated MI was evaluated on Ejection fraction (p=<0.05). Azelnidipine significantly improved ejection fraction (42% vs 31%, P<0.05) and prevented left ventricular remodeling compared to untreated myocardial infarction in rats.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: