Key result
3D dense U-Net accelerates MRI segmentation ~3,600-fold while maintaining strong correlation with manual measurements.
Why the study?
Clinical use of tissue phase mapping MRI is limited by the labor-intensive manual segmentation of cardiac contours required across all time frames.
Does a deep learning network reduce segmentation time without significant loss in accuracy compared to manual segmentation for tissue phase mapping MRI in heart transplant patients?
Does a deep learning network reduce segmentation time without significant loss in accuracy compared to manual segmentation for tissue phase mapping MRI in heart transplant patients?
A deep learning network can automate biventricular contour segmentation in tissue phase mapping MRI, drastically reducing processing time while maintaining accuracy comparable to manual segmentation.
Tissue phase mapping (TPM) is an MRI technique for quantification of regional biventricular myocardial velocities. Despite its potential, clinical use is limited due to the requisite labor‐intensive manual segmentation of cardiac contours for all time frames. The purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning (DL) network for automated segmentation of TPM images, without significant loss in segmentation and myocardial velocity quantification accuracy compared with manual segmentation. We implemented a multi‐channel 3D (three dimensional; 2D + time) dense U‐Net that trained on magnitude and phase images and combined cross‐entropy, Dice, and Hausdorff distance loss terms to improve the segmentation accuracy and suppress unnatural boundaries. The dense U‐Net was trained and tested with 150 multi‐slice, multi‐phase TPM scans (114 scans for training, 36 for testing) from 99 heart transplant patients (44 females, 1‐4 scans/patient), where the magnitude and velocity‐encoded ( V x , V y , V z ) images were used as input and the corresponding manual segmentation masks were used as reference. The accuracy of DL segmentation was evaluated using quantitative metrics (Dice scores, Hausdorff distance) and linear regression and Bland‐Altman analyses on the resulting peak radial and longitudinal velocities ( V r and V z ). The mean segmentation time was about 2 h per patient for manual and 1.9 ± 0.3 s for DL. Our network produced good accuracy (median Dice = 0.85 for left ventricle (LV), 0.64 for right ventricle (RV), Hausdorff distance = 3.17 pixels) compared with manual segmentation. Peak V r and V z measured from manual and DL segmentations were strongly correlated ( R ≥ 0.88) and in good agreement with manual analysis (mean difference and limits of agreement for V z and V r were −0.05 ± 0.98 cm/s and −0.06 ± 1.18 cm/s for LV, and −0.21 ± 2.33 cm/s and 0.46 ± 4.00 cm/s for RV, respectively). The proposed multi‐channel 3D dense U‐Net was capable of reducing the segmentation time by 3,600‐fold, without significant loss in accuracy in tissue velocity measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2021) studied Heart transplant (n=99). Deep learning automated segmentation (multi-channel 3D dense U-Net) vs. Manual segmentation was evaluated on Segmentation accuracy (Dice scores, Hausdorff distance) and peak radial and longitudinal velocities. A multi-channel 3D dense U-Net reduced tissue phase mapping MRI segmentation time by 3,600-fold (1.9 s vs 2 h) while maintaining strong correlation (R ≥ 0.88) with manual velocity measurements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: