Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Building a self-gravitating hydrodynamic code as a combination of a hydrodynamic solver and a gravity solver is discussed. We show that straightforward combining of those two solvers generally leads to a code that does not conserve energy locally, and instead a special gravitational consistency condition ought to be satisfied. A particular example of combining softened Lagrangian hydrodynamics (SLH) with a P³M gravity solver is used to demonstrate the effect of the gravitational consistency condition for a self-gravitating hydrodynamic code. The need to supplement the SLH method with the P³M gravity solver arose because the moving mesh gravity solver, used in conjunction with the SLH method previously, was found to produce inaccurate results. We also show that most existing cosmological hydrodynamic codes implicitly satisfy the gravitational consistency condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gnedin et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: