Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To analyze the influence of multi-detector row spiral computed tomography (CT) on identification of peripheral pulmonary arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peripheral pulmonary arteries were analyzed on optimally opacified contrast material-enhanced spiral CT angiograms in 30 patients devoid of pleuroparenchymal disease who underwent scanning with multi-detector row CT (collimation, 4 x 1 mm; pitch, 1.7-2.0; scanning time, 0.5 second). Two series of scans were systematically generated from each data set, 1.25-mm-thick (group 1) and 3-mm-thick (group 2) sections, leading to the analysis of 600 segmental (20 arteries per patient), 1,200 subsegmental (40 arteries per patient), 2,400 fifth-order (80 arteries per patient), and 4,800 sixth-order (160 arteries per patient) pulmonary arteries in each group. RESULTS: Multi-detector row CT with reconstructed scans of 1.25-mm-thick sections (group 1) allowed (a) analysis of a significantly higher percentage of subsegmental arteries (94% in group 1 vs 82% in group 2; P <.001) and (b) a significantly higher percentage of fifth- and sixth-order arteries, respectively, identified in 74% and 35% of cases in group 1 and 47% and 16% in group 2 (P <.001). The causes for inadequate depiction of subsegmental branches in group 1 were partial volume effect (43%), anatomic variants (39%), and cardiac (17%) and respiratory (1%) motion artifacts. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT with reconstructed scans of 1.25-mm-thick sections enables accurate analysis of peripheral pulmonary arteries down to the fifth order on spiral CT angiograms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghaye et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: