Key result
SelectSecure RV septal pacing shows no benefit over conventional pacing for HF hospitalization.
Why the study?
Does right ventricular septal pacing with a thin lumenless lead reduce heart failure hospitalization or improve pacing parameters compared to conventional septal or apical pacing in patients requiring RV pacing?
Case-Control (n=129)
Single-blind
No
Does right ventricular septal pacing with a thin lumenless lead reduce heart failure hospitalization or improve pacing parameters compared to conventional septal or apical pacing in patients requiring RV pacing?
Right ventricular septal pacing with a lumenless lead produces a narrow QRS comparable to conventional septal pacing without reducing heart failure hospitalizations, but is associated with higher chronic pacing thresholds.
No HF hospitalization reduction seen with SelectSecure septal pacing; leaves open optimal RV lead selection in observational data.
The SelectSecure™ lead system (SSLS), which is composed of a thin lumenless, active-fixation lead and a deflectable catheter, is approved for use in Japan. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of right ventricular (RV) septal pacing with the SSLS along with the system's safety and electrical performance. A total of 129 patients were divided into the following 3 groups: the RV septal pacing with the SSLS group (SSP, n = 21); the RV septal pacing with the conventional lead group (Septal, n = 77); and the RV apical pacing with the conventional lead group (Apical, n = 31). All lead-related complications and pacing parameters during follow-up were compared among the groups. The clinical outcome was heart failure-associated hospitalization. The SSP and Septal groups showed significantly shorter paced QRS duration than the Apical group. During the follow-up for a mean of 49.5 ± 13.1 months, no lead-related complications occurred in any of the groups. A case of pericardial effusion occurred in the SSP group, but cardiac tamponade did not occur, and it spontaneously resolved. The ventricular pacing threshold after the follow-up period was higher in the SSP group than in the other 2 groups. There was no difference in the primary heart failure hospitalization among the 3 groups. The SSLS could be effective in producing a narrow QRS width with RV septal pacing, but its pacing threshold was higher than conventional leads in the chronic phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (2018) conducted a case-control in Bradyarrhythmia (n=129). SelectSecure lead system (SSP) for right ventricular septal pacing vs. Conventional lead for right ventricular septal or apical pacing was evaluated on Heart failure hospitalization. Right ventricular septal pacing using the SelectSecure lead system resulted in no significant difference in heart failure hospitalization compared to conventional septal or apical pacing (9.5% vs 14.3% and 22.6%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: