This paper explores an interesting and under-researched issue in the field of visual brand recognition. Although logo orientation is a ubiquitous feature of brand design, its role in shaping temporal brand meaning remains underexplored, particularly in omnichannel retail, where a distinctive brand identity is essential. Drawing on space-time metaphor theory, this research proposes that left-right logo orientation functions as a spatial cue that communicates temporal brand meaning. Specifically, a left-facing logo increases the relative salience of brand heritage, whereas a right-facing logo enhances the perceptual prominence of a brand's future orientation. Across seven experiments using cross-cultural samples, including six in China and one in the United States, we demonstrate that these temporal perceptions mediate the effect of logo direction on purchase intention. We further identify key boundary conditions. The effect is amplified when logo direction aligns with the consumer's situational motivational state (prevention vs. promotion focus), temporal focus (past vs. future), and brand characteristics (traditional vs. modern positioning). By integrating space-time metaphor theory with regulatory focus, temporal cognition, and brand congruency perspectives, this research advances understanding of how subtle visual design elements influence consumer judgment. The findings contribute to research on retail visual merchandising, visual marketing, and temporal branding by linking micro-level design attributes to macro-level brand evaluations and offering actionable guidance for aligning logo orientation with strategic brand positioning. • Logo left (right) increases brand heritage (future) perceptions. • Effect is stronger when logo direction fits regulatory focus (promotion/prevention). • Past-focused consumers prefer left-facing logos, future-focused ones prefer right. • Brand positioning moderates: left benefits traditional brands, right benefits modern. • Heritage/future perceptions mediate logo orientation's impact on purchase intent.
Huang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.