In-depth country studies identify barriers to effective negotiations in mining, suggesting integrated approaches for resolution.
Based on seven in-depth country studies, this article explores the nature and challenges of business–community negotiations in the mining sector of Latin America and identifies a common set of institutional, organizational, and structural barriers to conflict resolution that render mutual gains approaches to negotiations rare and difficult to implement. These barriers include a weak rule of law; inequalities in access to justice; power asymmetries; incentives for short-term distributive negotiations rather than long-term value-creating agreements; and deep value differences, all of which feed into zero-sum dynamics in business–community—and even intracommunity—negotiations. Based on a normative-theoretical discussion of the implications of our findings, the article recommends integrating a rights-based approach with inclusive dialogue-based practices in ways that curb the institutional barriers that we identify and may generate incentives for long-term value-creating negotiations between business and communities, as well as sustainable use of natural resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Estrada et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: