Evaluates turbulence models for predicting velocity gradients in stirred tanks, indicating design implications for flocculation.
This study compares the predictive capability of four turbulence modelling approaches for local velocity gradients in a Rushton turbine stirred tank representative of coagulation and flocculation applications. Three finite-volume RANS closures – standard k–ɛ, k–ω SST, and the Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) – Implemented in Siemens STAR-CCM+ are evaluated alongside a Lattice-Boltzmann LES solver (M-Star CFD) against a publicly available CFD-grade PIV dataset. Normalized radial velocity profiles are compared at two radial positions and two impeller speeds (650 and 1500 rpm), with model accuracy quantified by the normalized root-mean-square deviation (NRMSD). The standard k–ɛ model achieves the lowest average NRMSD (0.052), followed by M-Star LBM-LES (0.066), RSM (0.110), and k–ω SST (0.125). A key finding is the systematic amplification of velocity errors when converted to local velocity gradients: moderate velocity deviations produce disproportionately large gradient errors that cross the floc breakage threshold (80–200 s −1 ), with direct implications for flocculation design. Spatial analysis of the predicted velocity fields reveals a qualitative distinction between the two paradigms: RANS solutions produce smooth, diffused fields, whereas LBM-LES retains fine-grained spatial heterogeneity that better represents the local gradient distributions governing floc fate. The results support a two-tier recommendation: k–ɛ for scalar accuracy of mean flow predictions, and LBM-LES where spatially resolved gradient distributions are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strogonov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: