Key result
Managing antithrombotics during high-risk endoscopy is linked to ~10% absolute bleeding risk difference versus nonusers.
Why the study?
Optimal management of antithrombotic drugs is essential to minimize bleeding during high-risk endoscopic procedures, motivating investigation into peri-procedural strategies to reduce 30-day post-procedural bleeding.
Does peri-procedural antithrombotic drug management affect the risk of 30-day bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis in patients undergoing high-risk endoscopic procedures?
Cohort (n=36,201)
Yes
Does peri-procedural antithrombotic drug management affect the risk of 30-day bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis in patients undergoing high-risk endoscopic procedures?
Peri-procedural antithrombotic drug management during high-risk endoscopic procedures is associated with small absolute increases in 30-day bleeding risk (<10% for upper-GI, <5% for lower-GI) compared to nonusers.
Bleeding risk after upper-GI procedures on antithrombotics merits clinical attention; extends observational data yet leaves optimal periprocedural strategies open.
Background & Aims: Optimal management of antithrombotic drugs (ATDs) is essential to minimize bleeding during high-risk endoscopic procedures. This study aimed to investigate peri-procedural ATD strategies to reduce 30-day post-procedural bleeding. Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study on high-risk endoscopic procedures. The primary outcome was 30-day bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis. We categorized the peri-procedure management of ATDs into continuation, discontinuation, and replacement. We evaluated the risk differences in 30-day bleeding among ATD management groups, as compared to patients who did not take ATDs (nonusers). Results: High-risk upper-GI procedures included 1365 esophageal ESDs, 788 elective EVLs, 5391 gastric ESDs, and 2562 PEGs; lower-GI procedures included 23326 colonic polypectomy/EMRs and 2769 colonic ESDs. ATDs management included aspirin continuation (n=818) and discontinuation (n=62); thienopyridine discontinuation (n=188) and replacement (n=97); warfarin continuation (n=97) and discontinuation (n=20); DOAC discontinuation (n=487). Thirty-day bleeding occurred in 5.89% of upper-GI and 1.22% of lower-GI procedures. Bleeding risk differed according to antithrombotic drug management. In upper-GI procedures, numerically higher bleeding rates were observed in some antithrombotic management groups, particularly aspirin continuation and thienopyridine discontinuation during gastric ESD, compared with nonusers; however, the absolute risk differences were within 10%. In contrast, bleeding risk differences in lower-GI procedures were smaller overall and within 5%. Conclusions: This multicenter study describes differential bleeding risk patterns across high-risk endoscopic procedures among patients receiving antithrombotic therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
IMAI et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in High-risk endoscopic procedures (n=36,201). Peri-procedural antithrombotic drug management (continuation, discontinuation, or replacement) vs. Nonusers of antithrombotic drugs was evaluated on 30-day bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis. Peri-procedural antithrombotic drug management during high-risk endoscopic procedures resulted in absolute bleeding risk differences of <10% for upper-GI and <5% for lower-GI compared to nonusers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: