Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis explores interactions with social AI, revealing ethical dimensions under uncertainty.
This paper examines social AI through the lens of non-knowledge, arguing that current Responsible AI discourse overemphasises knowledge, control, and transparency while overlooking the epistemic uncertainty that structures human–AI interaction. Drawing on Enlightenment epistemology (Locke, Hume, Smith) and Luhmann’s theory of nonknowledge, it analyses Replika and Kindroid as distinct models of relationality. The paper shows that social AI does not simulate relationships, but co-produces them through interaction under conditions of epistemic indeterminacy. Responsible AI, therefore, emerges not as the elimination of uncertainty, but as ethical action within it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simone Broders (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: