Structural candidate analysis of knowledge proposes a framework tracking epistemic failures, suggesting implications for philosophical inquiry.
We propose a context-indexed framework for analyzing knowledge, synthesizedfrom virtue epistemology, modal epistemology, and defeasibility theory. The central analysis is:Context-Indexed Knowledge Equation. The framework specifies seven conditions tracking distinct epistemic failure modes,with explicit context and threshold parameters. Through adversarial stress-testingagainst 26 counterexample categories, we argue that this architecture handlesknown Gettier variants. We explicitly acknowledge: this is a structural candidateanalysis, not a reductive metaphysical definition; key terms remain philosophicallycontested; the framework separates core claims from optional extensions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sidhartha Mazumder (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: