Key result
A novel 4-D B-spline model applied to tagged MRI allows for concurrent determination of myocardial beads and 3-D displacement fields to produce Lagrangian strain maps of the left ventricle.
A novel 4-D B-spline modeling technique for MR tagging enables detailed 3-D visualization and strain mapping of left ventricular dynamics.
Current research investigating the modeling of left ventricular dynamics for accurate clinical assessment of cardiac function is extensive. Magnetic resonance (MR) tagging is a functional imaging method which allows for encoding of a grid of signal voids on cardiac MR images, providing a mechanism for noninvasive measurement of intramural tissue deformations, in vivo. We present a novel technique of employing a four-dimensional (4-D) B-spline model which permits concurrent determination of myocardial beads and myocardial strains. The method entails fitting the knot planes of the 4-D B-spline model for fixed times to a sequence of triplets of orthogonal sets of tag surfaces for all imaged volumetric frames within the constraints of the model's spatio-temporal internal energy. From a three-dimensional (3-D) displacement field, the corresponding long and short-axis Lagrangian normal, shear, and principal strain maps are produced. As an important byproduct, the points defined by the 3-D intersections of the triplets of orthogonal tag planes, which we refer to as myocardial beads, can easily be determined by our model. Displaying the beads as a movie loop allows for the visualization of the nonrigid movement of the left ventricle in 3-D.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tustison et al. (2003) studied Left ventricular dynamics assessment. 4-D B-spline model for tagged MRI was evaluated on Concurrent determination of myocardial beads and myocardial strains. A novel 4-D B-spline model applied to tagged MRI allows for concurrent determination of myocardial beads and 3-D displacement fields to produce Lagrangian strain maps of the left ventricle.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: