Key result
Outcomes based on serum creatinine and iothalamate GFR yielded similar main trial conclusions regarding the effects of interventions in patients with hypertensive nephrosclerosis.
Why the study?
Do renal outcomes based on serum creatinine yield similar trial conclusions compared to outcomes based on iothalamate GFR in patients with hypertensive nephrosclerosis?
Population
1094 African Americans with hypertensive nephrosclerosis from the African American Study of Kidney Disease…
Comparison
Renal outcomes based on serum creatinine vs Renal outcomes based on iothalamate GFR (iGFR)
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Serum creatinine-based eGFR may suffice for renal outcome trials in hypertensive nephrosclerosis; leaves open validation in other populations and endpoints.
Observational (n=1,094)
Do renal outcomes based on serum creatinine yield similar trial conclusions compared to outcomes based on iothalamate GFR in patients with hypertensive nephrosclerosis?
Serum creatinine-based estimated GFR yields similar overall trial conclusions to iothalamate GFR, supporting its use in the design of clinical trials with renal outcomes.
Lewis et al. (2004) conducted an observational in hypertensive nephrosclerosis (n=1,094). iothalamate GFR (iGFR)-based outcomes vs. serum creatinine-based outcomes was evaluated on Time-to-event composite outcomes (GFR decline/doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, or death) and GFR slopes. Outcomes based on serum creatinine and iothalamate GFR yielded similar main trial conclusions regarding the effects of interventions in patients with hypertensive nephrosclerosis.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: