Conduction system pacing in everyday clinical practice: EHRA physician survey
Key result
European physician survey outlines current practices, preferred tools, and unmet needs for CSP.
Why the study?
With increasing interest in conduction system pacing and its inclusion in current guidelines, the study aimed to provide a snapshot of current clinical practice across Europe.
What is the current practice, experience, and perception of conduction system pacing among physicians in Europe?
Population
Physicians participating in the European Heart Rhythm Association research network, national societies, and social media
Design
Online questionnaire survey
Authors
Discussion
Loading...
Member takes
Implication
Survey reveals heterogeneous European conduction system pacing practices; leaves open need for standardized indications and prospective outcome trials.
Study Design
Type
Cross-Sectional
Multicenter
Yes
Structured PICO
What is the current practice, experience, and perception of conduction system pacing among physicians in Europe?
P
Population
Physicians participating in the European Heart Rhythm Association research network, national societies, and over social media
I
Intervention
Online questionnaire regarding conduction system pacing (CSP)
O
Outcome
Data on previous experience with CSP, current indications, preferred tools, unmet needs, and perceptions for the future
This survey provides a snapshot of current clinical practice, tools, and perceptions regarding conduction system pacing across Europe.
Cite This Study
Kirćanski et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Conduction system pacing practice. Online questionnaire on conduction system pacing was evaluated on Previous experience with CSP, current indications, preferred tools, unmet needs, and perceptions for the future. An online survey of European physicians provided a snapshot of current practice, experience, indications, preferred tools, and unmet needs regarding conduction system pacing.