This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The Penn Treebank has recently implemented a new syntactic annotation scheme, designed to highlight aspects of predicate-argument structure. This paper discusses the implementation of crucial aspects of this new annotation scheme. It incorporates a more consistent treatment of a wide range of grammatical phenomena, provides a set of coindexed null elements in what can be thought of as "underlying" position for phenomena such as wh-movement, passive, and the subjects of infinitival constructions, provides some non-context free annotational mechanism to allow the structure of discontinuous constituents to be easily recovered, and allows for a clear, concise tagging system for some semantic roles.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcus et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: