Testing 12 candidate genetic variants for association with general intelligence across three longitudinal studies (N=9,771) yielded only 1 nominally significant result out of 32 independent tests.
Observational (n=9,771)
Yes
Do specific candidate gene SNPs associate with general intelligence?
Previously reported candidate gene associations with general intelligence are likely false positives, highlighting the need for approaches beyond candidate gene examination in behavioral genetics.
General intelligence (g) and virtually all other behavioral traits are heritable. Associations between g and specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in several candidate genes involved in brain function have been reported. We sought to replicate published associations between g and 12 specific genetic variants (in the genes DTNBP1, CTSD, DRD2, ANKK1, CHRM2, SSADH, COMT, BDNF, CHRNA4, DISC1, APOE, and SNAP25) using data sets from three independent, well-characterized longitudinal studies with samples of 5,571, 1,759, and 2,441 individuals. Of 32 independent tests across all three data sets, only 1 was nominally significant. By contrast, power analyses showed that we should have expected 10 to 15 significant associations, given reasonable assumptions for genotype effect sizes. For positive controls, we confirmed accepted genetic associations for Alzheimer's disease and body mass index, and we used SNP-based calculations of genetic relatedness to replicate previous estimates that about half of the variance in g is accounted for by common genetic variation among individuals. We conclude that the molecular genetics of psychology and social science requires approaches that go beyond the examination of candidate genes.
Chabris et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in General intelligence (n=9,771). 12 specific genetic variants (candidate genes) was evaluated on Association between general intelligence and 12 specific genetic variants. Testing 12 candidate genetic variants for association with general intelligence across three longitudinal studies (N=9,771) yielded only 1 nominally significant result out of 32 independent tests.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: