Key result
Quantitative coronary angiography shows progressive restenosis up to 4 months following PTCA.
Why the study?
Experimental, clinical, and pathologic studies suggested that restenosis begins very early after coronary angioplasty. This study prospectively determined the time-related incidence of restenosis after PTCA using multiple quantitative angiographic criteria.
Cohort (n=342)
Restenosis after coronary angioplasty is a time-related progressive phenomenon up to at least 3-4 months, and its reported incidence varies widely depending on the angiographic definition used, favoring absolute quantitative measurements of luminal diameter over percentage stenosis.
Restenosis incidence rises progressively to 4 months post-PTCA; leaves open optimal surveillance timing and criteria in the contemporary stent era.
Data from experimental, clinical, and pathologic studies have suggested that the process of restenosis begins very early after coronary angioplasty. The present study was performed to determine prospectively the incidence of restenosis with use of the four National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the 50% or greater diameter stenosis criteria, as well as a criterion based on a decrease of 0.72 mm or more in minimal luminal diameter. Patients were recatheterized at 30, 60, 90, or 120 days after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). After PTCA all patients received 10 mg nifedipine three to six times a day and aspirin once a day until repeat angiography. Of 400 consecutive patients in whom PTCA was successful (less than 50% diameter stenosis), 342 underwent quantitative angiographic follow-up (86%) by use of an automated edge-detection technique. A wide variation in the incidence of restenosis was found dependent on the criterion applied. The incidence of restenosis proved to be progressive to at least the third month for all except NHLBI criterion II. At 4 months a further increase in the incidence of restenosis was observed when defined as a decrease of 0.72 mm or more in minimal luminal diameter, whereas the criteria based on percentage diameter stenosis showed a variable response. The lack of overlap between the different restenosis criteria applied affirms the arbitrary nature of angiographic definitions currently in use. Restenosis should be assessed by repeat angiography, and preferably ascertained according to the change in absolute quantitative measurements of the luminal diameter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serruys et al. (1988) conducted a cohort in Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (n=342). Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with quantitative angiographic follow-up vs. Different angiographic restenosis definitions and follow-up intervals (30, 60, 90, or 120 days) was evaluated on Incidence of angiographic restenosis defined by NHLBI criteria, ≥50% diameter stenosis, or ≥0.72 mm decrease in minimal luminal diameter. Quantitative angiography after PTCA showed progressive restenosis up to 4 months when defined by a ≥0.72 mm decrease in minimal luminal diameter, varying widely across criteria.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: