Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AbstrakUnder his research the author does elaboration through Hak Cipta andcopyright in clearly by those history and implication in practice. This articleannounces that hak cipta is not copyright eventhough in the inside of hakcipta contained copyright. Hak cipta itself under that history has been trulyas revision of copyright doctrine in England. That revision movement washappened in Europe continent under doctrine of justice (of natural law)which says that protection ought to be given to the inventor not tocorporations that based on copyright. Then later in implication is not truethat corporations aim to taking over all of inventor right even under specificcontract. The author convinces that right shall not be alienated from theinventor basedfreedom of contract principle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agus Sardjono (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: