Key result
Tailored TAVR device selection optimizes outcomes based on patient anatomy and operator experience.
Why the study?
Device iterations and novel concepts allow treatment of a broader patient spectrum, necessitating a sophisticated, tailored selection of current-generation transcatheter aortic valves based on anatomy, patient characteristics, and operator experience.
This review provides a practical framework for clinicians to select the optimal transcatheter aortic valve platform tailored to individual patient anatomy and clinical characteristics.
May inform tailored TAVR device selection; leaves open need for randomized platform comparisons.
Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve Replacement (TAVR) has become the standard therapy for patients with severe aortic stenosis in patients over 75 years old in Europe or 65 years old in the United States, regardless of the surgical risk. Furthermore, iterations of existing transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs), as well as devices with novel concepts, have provided substantial improvements with respect to the limitations of previous-generation devices. Hence, treatment of a broader spectrum of patients has become feasible, and a sophisticated selection of the appropriate TAV tailored to patients' anatomy and comorbidities is now possible. Anatomy, patient characteristics, and operator experience must all inform proper device selection. This review describes the features and performance of the current generation of TAVs with the aim of providing a practical approach for clinicians when selecting the appropriate TAV for a specific patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valvo et al. (2025) conducted a review in Severe aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was evaluated. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement device selection must be tailored to patient anatomy, characteristics, and operator experience to optimize outcomes across a broader spectrum of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: