Key result
Review outlines standardized durability definitions and long-term performance data for bioprosthetic valves and TAVR.
Why the study?
As transcatheter aortic valve replacement shifts to younger, lower-risk patients, long-term durability beyond 5 years remains unclear, motivating this review of standardized definitions and available long-term data.
What are the standardized definitions and available data regarding the long-term durability of transcatheter aortic valves?
What are the standardized definitions and available data regarding the long-term durability of transcatheter aortic valves?
This review summarizes standardized definitions and current data on the long-term durability of transcatheter aortic valves, which is crucial as TAVR expands to younger, lower-risk patients.
Standardized definitions aid durability assessment as TAVR expands to younger patients; leaves open need for extended prospective data.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is a well-established alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Currently, this technique is shifting towards younger patient groups with intermediate- and low-risk profile, which raises the question about long-term durability. Despite acceptable results up to 5 years, little is currently known about valve performance beyond 5 years. Since valve deterioration, thrombosis and endocarditis seem to be the main factors affecting valve durability, precise and widely accepted definitions of these parameters were stated by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) in 2017, followed by the Valve in Valve International Data (VIVID) group definitions in 2018 and the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) definitions in 2021. Until the introduction of these definitions, interstudy comparisons were difficult due to missing uniformity. Since the release of these recommendations, an increasing number of studies have reported their data on long-term durability using these new criteria. The aim of the present article is to discuss the current definitions on bioprosthetic valve durability, and to summarize the available data on long-term durability of transcatheter aortic valves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richter et al. (2021) conducted a review in Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement was evaluated. This review summarizes current standardized definitions (EAPCI, VIVID, VARC-3) for bioprosthetic valve durability and available data on the long-term durability of transcatheter aortic valves.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: