Key result
LBBB shows no link to higher obstructive CAD prevalence on CCTA versus matched controls.
Why the study?
Does the presence of left bundle branch block predict obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary CT angiography in patients without known CAD?
Case-Control (n=818)
Does the presence of left bundle branch block predict obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary CT angiography in patients without known CAD?
In patients with low-to-moderate pre-test probability, the presence of LBBB is not an independent predictor of obstructive CAD on CCTA.
LBBB does not predict obstructive CAD on CCTA in low-moderate risk patients; leaves open whether it warrants testing or predicts events.
AIMS: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is considered an unfavourable prognostic marker in patients with underlying heart disease. Testing for coronary artery disease (CAD) is often prompted by incidental LBBB finding, but published studies disagree about a significant association between LBBB and CAD. We therefore assessed the association of LBBB with previously unknown CAD in patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 818 patients (mean age 57.2 ± 11.1 years, 106 patients with presumably new LBBB and 712 controls) without known CAD who underwent 64-slice CCTA. Image quality was assessed for each coronary segment. Comparison of obstructive CAD prevalence (defined as ≥50% stenosis) was performed using triple case-matching for pre-test probability (based on age, gender, and symptom typicality) in 101 LBBB patients and 303 matched controls with diagnostic quality in all segments. We found no difference in obstructive CAD prevalence between LBBB patients and matched controls (15 vs. 16%, P = 0.88). Similarly, there were no significant differences in cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), stenosis severity, CAD extent, non-obstructive CAD, and vessel-based analysis between patient groups. Image quality was very high in LBBB patients and comparable to controls. On multivariate analysis, age, gender, typical angina, and CVRF, but not LBBB (P = 0.94), emerged as significant and independent predictors of obstructive CAD. CONCLUSION: CAD prevalence is similar in LBBB patients at low-to-moderate pre-test probability compared with controls with similar CVRF matched for age, gender, and symptom typicality. CCTA is a useful imaging modality in LBBB patients, providing comparable image quality to non-LBBB controls.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clerc et al. (2015) conducted a case-control in Left bundle branch block and suspected coronary artery disease (n=818). Left bundle branch block vs. Matched controls without LBBB was evaluated on Prevalence of obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis) (p=0.88). Left bundle branch block was not associated with a higher prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease on CCTA compared to matched controls (15% vs. 16%, P=0.88).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: