Why the study?
To evaluate the midterm survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes of the On-X mechanical mitral valve based on 5-year trial results.
Does the On-X mechanical mitral valve provide favorable survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes in patients requiring mitral valve replacement?
Does the On-X mechanical mitral valve provide favorable survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes in patients requiring mitral valve replacement?
The On-X mechanical mitral valve provides excellent midterm survival, stable hemodynamics, and improved functional status up to 5 years post-implantation.
Supports On-X mechanical mitral valve use; extends PROACT with favorable midterm survival and hemodynamics in replacement.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the midterm survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes of the On-X mechanical mitral valve, based on the 5-year results of the Prospective Randomized On-X Anticoagulation Clinical Trial (PROACT). METHOD: PROACT Mitral was a multicenter study evaluating 401 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) with either Standard or Conform-X On-X mitral valves, comparing low-dose and standard-dose warfarin. Here we report prespecified secondary outcomes of survival, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, and valve hemodynamics as assessed by core lab-adjudicated echocardiography at 1, 3, and 5 years in the pooled population. RESULTS: Actuarial survival was 99.7% at 1 year, 95.1% at 3 years, and 92.4% at 5 years, with no significant difference between the Standard and Conform-X cuffs. Hemodynamic analysis revealed a mean transvalvular pressure gradient (MG) of 4.6 ± 2.0 mm Hg at 1 year, with no interaction between valve size and patient body surface area. MG values were consistent over time. Quality of life improved with 96.6% of patients in NYHA class I or II at the latest available follow-up of 3 or 5 years. There were no significant differences in survival, clinical, or hemodynamic outcomes between valve sizes. CONCLUSIONS: The On-X mechanical mitral valve demonstrated favorable survival, stable hemodynamics, and enhanced quality of life up to 5 years postimplantation. Derived from high-quality, rigorous randomized trial data, these findings can guide decision making in young patients requiring MVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruel et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: