Key result
Clinically relevant performance metrics validate robotic surgery trainee proficiency but lack correlation with patient outcomes.
Why the study?
This review aimed to define clinically relevant performance metrics (CRPMs), assess their validity in robotic surgical training, and compare CRPMs to existing measures of robotic performance.
Systematic Review
CRPMs are a validated and objective approach for assessing trainee proficiency in robotic surgery, but their correlation with clinical outcomes remains unstudied.
Clinically relevant performance metrics enable objective robotic surgery trainee assessment; leaves open their linkage to patient outcomes.
A crucial element of any surgical training program is the ability to provide procedure-specific, objective, and reliable measures of performance. During robotic surgery, objective clinically relevant performance metrics (CRPMs) can provide tailored contextual feedback and correlate with clinical outcomes. This review aims to define CRPMs, assess their validity in robotic surgical training and compare CRPMs to existing measures of robotic performance. A systematic search of Medline and Embase databases was conducted in May 2022 following the PRISMA guidelines. The search terms included Clinically Relevant Performance Metrics (CRPMs) OR Clinically Relevant Outcome Measures (CROMs) AND robotic surgery. The study settings, speciality, operative context, study design, metric details, and validation status were extracted and analysed. The initial search yielded 116 citations, of which 6 were included. Citation searching identified 3 additional studies, resulting in 9 studies included in this review. Metrics were defined as CRPMs, CROMs, proficiency-based performance metrics and reference-procedure metrics which were developed using a modified Delphi methodology. All metrics underwent both contents and construct validation. Two studies found a strong correlation with GEARS but none correlated their metrics with patient outcome data. CRPMs are a validated and objective approach for assessing trainee proficiency. Evaluating CRPMs with other robotic-assessment tools will facilitate a multimodal metric evaluation approach to robotic surgery training. Further studies should assess the correlation with clinical outcomes. This review highlights there is significant scope for the development and validation of CRPMs to establish proficiency-based progression curricula that can be translated from a simulation setting into clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Younes et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Robotic surgery training. Clinically Relevant Performance Metrics (CRPMs) vs. Existing measures of robotic performance (e.g., GEARS) was evaluated on Validity of CRPMs in robotic surgical training. Clinically relevant performance metrics are a validated and objective approach for assessing trainee proficiency in robotic surgery, though none of the included studies correlated metrics with patient outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: