Key result
Six objective performance indicators of instrument usage and smoothness link to bleeding in porcine robotic lobectomy.
Why the study?
Surgical training relies on subjective feedback, and it was unknown whether objective performance indicators during the initial task of robotic-assisted lobectomy correlate with intraoperative bleeding.
Do objective performance indicators (OPIs) correlate with bleeding events during robotic-assisted lobectomy in a porcine model?
Observational (n=46)
No
Do objective performance indicators (OPIs) correlate with bleeding events during robotic-assisted lobectomy in a porcine model?
p-value: p=<0.05
Kinematic and video analytics can establish a correlation between objective performance metrics and bleeding events during robotic-assisted lobectomy in an ex vivo model, suggesting utility for surgical training assessment.
OPIs linked to bleeding in porcine robotic lobectomy may aid training assessment; leaves open human validation and clinical adoption.
Objective Surgical training relies on subjective feedback on resident technical performance by attending surgeons. A novel data recorder connected to a robotic-assisted surgical platform captures synchronized kinematic and video data during an operation to calculate quantitative, objective performance indicators (OPIs). The aim of this study was to determine if OPIs during initial task of a resident’s robotic-assisted lobectomy (RL) correlated with bleeding during the procedure. Methods Forty-six residents from the 2019 Thoracic Surgery Directors Association Resident Boot Camp completed RL on an ex-vivo perfused porcine model while continuous video and kinematic data was recorded. For this pilot study RL was segmented into 12 tasks and OPIs were calculated for the initial major task. Cases were reviewed for major bleeding events and OPIs of bleeding cases were compared to those who did not. Results Data from 42 residents were complete and included in the analysis. 10/42 residents (23.8%) encountered bleeding: 10/40 residents who started with superior pulmonary vein exposure and 0/2 residents who started with pulmonary artery exposure. Twenty OPIs for both hands were assessed during the initial task. Six OPIs related to instrument usage or smoothness of motion were significant for bleeding. Differences were statistically significant for both hands (p < 0.05). OPIs showing bimanual asymmetry indicated lower proficiency. Conclusion This study demonstrates that kinematic and video analytics can establish a correlation between objective performance metrics and bleeding events in an ex vivo perfused lobectomy. Further study could assist in the development of focused exercises and simulation on objective domains to help improve overall performance and reducing complications during RL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lazar et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Cardiothoracic surgery residents performing robotic-assisted lobectomy (n=46). Robotic-assisted lobectomy on ex-vivo porcine model vs. Residents without bleeding events was evaluated on Objective performance indicators (OPIs) associated with bleeding events during the initial task (p=<0.05). Six objective performance indicators related to instrument usage and smoothness of motion were significantly associated with bleeding events during robotic-assisted lobectomy on a porcine model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: