Key result
Diagnostic algorithm detects vaccine-like rotavirus in ~62% of suspected post-vaccination gastroenteritis cases.
Why the study?
Pediatricians and diagnostic laboratories needed to determine whether cases of acute gastroenteritis after rotavirus vaccination were caused by vaccine or wild-type strains.
Can a PCR-based testing algorithm distinguish between wild-type and vaccine rotavirus strains in infants with acute gastroenteritis following vaccination?
Observational (n=74)
Can a PCR-based testing algorithm distinguish between wild-type and vaccine rotavirus strains in infants with acute gastroenteritis following vaccination?
RVA-positive acute gastroenteritis after vaccination is not always caused by the vaccine strain, and a PCR-based workflow can reliably distinguish between wild-type and vaccine strains.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PCR-based algorithms may differentiate vaccine from wild-type rotavirus strains in post-vaccination gastroenteritis; leaves open routine clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Human group A rotaviruses (RVA) are important enteric pathogens, as they are a leading cause of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) in children worldwide. Since 2013, the German Standing Committee on vaccination recommended the routine rotavirus vaccination for infants in Germany. While vaccination has significantly decreased RVA cases and worldwide mortality, in some cases, infants can develop acute gastroenteritis as an adverse reaction after immunization with an attenuated live vaccine. Pediatricians, as well as clinicians and diagnostic laboratories, contacted the Consultant Laboratory for Rotaviruses and inquired whether cases of RVA-positive AGE after vaccination were associated with vaccine or with wild-type RVA strains. A testing algorithm based on distinguishing PCRs and confirmative sequencing was designed, tested, and applied. Diagnostic samples from 68 vaccinated children and six cases where horizontal transmission was suspected were investigated in this study. Using a combination of real-time PCR, fragment-length analysis of amplicons from multiplex PCRs and confirmative sequencing, vaccine-like virus was detected in 46 samples and wild-type RVA was detected in 6 samples. Three mixed infections of vaccine and wild-type RVA were detectable, no RVA genome was found in 19 samples. High viral loads (>1.0 × 107 copies/g stool) were measured in most RVA-positive samples. Furthermore, information on co-infections with other AGE pathogens in the vaccinated study population was of interest. A commercial multiplex PCR and in-house PCRs revealed three co-infections of vaccinated infants with bacteria (two samples with Clostridioides difficile and one sample with enteropathogenic E. coli) and six co-infections with norovirus in a subset of the samples. Human astrovirus was detected in one sample, with suspected horizontal transmission. The cases of suspected horizontal transmission of vaccine RVA strains could not be confirmed, as they either involved wild-type RVA or were RVA negative. This study shows that RVA-positive AGE after vaccination is not necessarily associated with the vaccine strain and provides a reliable workflow to distinguish RVA vaccine strains from wild-type strains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacobsen et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Acute gastroenteritis following rotavirus vaccination or suspected horizontal transmission (n=74). Diagnostic testing algorithm (PCR and sequencing) was evaluated on Detection and differentiation of vaccine-like versus wild-type RVA strains. A diagnostic testing algorithm identified vaccine-like rotavirus in 46 samples, wild-type in 6, and no rotavirus in 19 among 74 cases of post-vaccination gastroenteritis or suspected transmission.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: