The atomic beam magnetic resonance method has been used to measure the ratio of the g value of the two-electron system in helium in the metastable $1s2s$, ³S₁ state to the g value of the one-electron system in atomic hydrogen in the ground $1s$, ²S1/2 state. The metastable helium and the atomic hydrogen were alternately produced in a dc discharge tube. The helium beam was detected by measurement of the current of electrons ejected when the metastable atoms strike a wolfram wire. The hydrogen beam was detected by a Pirani gauge.The resonance frequencies for the transitions m=±1↔0 of helium and F, m=1, 0↔1, -1 of hydrogen were measured in the same magnetic field. Field values near 520 and 567 gauss were used. By the use of the Breit-Rabi formula for the hydrogen transition frequency, these measurements may be combined with experimental values for gₚgJ(H, ²S1/2) and Δν (hydrogen) to give the result gJ(He, ³S₁)gJ(H, ²S1/2)=1-(11±16)×10^-6. This result may be combined with the experimental value gJ(H, ²S1/2)ₑₓₚ=2(1.001128±12×10^-6) to give gJ(He, ³S₁)=2(1.001117±20×10^-6) or with the theoretical value gJ(H, ²S1/2)ₜₕₑₒᵣₑₜ=2(1.0011276) to give gJ(He, ³S₁)=2(1.001117±16×10^-6).These results are in good agreement with the theoretical values, [gJ(He, ³S₁)gJ(H, ²S1/2)]ₜₕₑₒᵣₑₜ=1-23×10^-6 gJ(He, ³S₁)ₜₕₑₒᵣₑₜ=2(1.001104), calculated to order α² by Perl and Hughes in the accompanying paper. This agreement tends to substantiate the arithmetic additivity of the anomalous magnetic moments of the two electrons and the nonradiative relativistic bound-state correction to the magnetic moment for the two electrons in helium. The mutual radiative correction arising from the Breit interaction is small compared with the experimental uncertainty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hughes et al. (1953) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: