Key result
Sine-wave modeling (SinMod) yielded significantly larger measurements for myocardial strain and torsion compared to harmonic-phase (HARP) analysis (P<0.001), meaning they are not interchangeable.
Why the study?
Does sine-wave modeling (SinMod) compared to harmonic-phase (HARP) analysis yield different measurements for myocardial strain and torsion in healthy controls and type-1 diabetes patients?
Observational
Does sine-wave modeling (SinMod) compared to harmonic-phase (HARP) analysis yield different measurements for myocardial strain and torsion in healthy controls and type-1 diabetes patients?
SinMod and HARP MRI tagging analysis techniques yield significantly different measurements for myocardial strain and torsion and cannot be used interchangeably.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tagging is a valuable technique for evaluating regional heart function. Currently, there are a number of different techniques for analyzing the tagged images. The purpose of this study is to compare the harmonic-phase (HARP) and sine-wave modeling (SinMod) tagging analysis techniques for evaluating myocardial strain and torsion in healthy controls and type-1 diabetes patients. All SinMod measurements were significantly larger than those by HARP (P<;0.001). Nevertheless, there existed consistency in the measurements by each technique, as seen by the good correlation between the HARP and SinMod measurements in both normals (R≥0.52) and patients (R≥0.48), except for apical strain (patients and controls) and mid-ventricular strain in patients. The inter-observer agreement was better in SinMod than in HARP for both torsion and strain (except at apex). In conclusion, under current operating conditions, the results from the two techniques cannot be used interchangeably.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibrahim et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Healthy controls and type-1 diabetes. Sine-wave modeling (SinMod) tagging analysis vs. Harmonic-phase (HARP) tagging analysis was evaluated on Myocardial strain and torsion (p=<0.001). Sine-wave modeling (SinMod) yielded significantly larger measurements for myocardial strain and torsion compared to harmonic-phase (HARP) analysis (P<0.001), meaning they are not interchangeable.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: