The paper looks at the emergence of a new conception of “border” in the heyday of what Enrique Dussel has called “Eurocentric modernity.” Such new understanding of borders inaugurated not only a new ius publicum europaeum (Carl Schmitt) and a “modern” Spirit of the Laws (Montesquieu), but also a new epistemic category—the “south”—conceived (from the European north) as the necessary antithesis for that self-understanding of Europe and the West that we call “Eurocentrism.” In this sense—this paper proposes—the European south is intimately tied to a global south and inseparable from it: they are both the “state of exception” defining by antithesis the spirit and identity of Europe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dainotto (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: