Key result
Conduction velocity mapping during AF inversely correlates with CDM-identified pivoting and rotational left atrial patterns.
Why the study?
Charge density mapping shows promise for persistent AF ablation but has limited availability, raising the question of whether its identified propagation patterns can be reliably detected using conventional contact mapping.
Can regions of the left atrium containing CDM-identified propagation patterns during AF be reliably identified using conventional contact mapping techniques in patients undergoing de novo ablation of persistent AF?
Observational (n=22)
Can regions of the left atrium containing CDM-identified propagation patterns during AF be reliably identified using conventional contact mapping techniques in patients undergoing de novo ablation of persistent AF?
Conduction velocity mapping during AF, but not during paced rhythms, correlates with advanced charge density mapping patterns, identifying the anteroseptal and inferoposterior walls as consistent targets for empirical ablation.
May allow standard mapping to target LA walls in persistent AF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
AIMS: Advanced technologies such as charge density mapping (CDM) show promise in guiding adjuvant ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF); however, their limited availability restricts widespread adoption. We sought to determine whether regions of the left atrium containing CDM-identified pivoting and rotational propagation patterns during AF could also be reliably identified using more conventional contact mapping techniques. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-two patients undergoing de novo ablation of persistent AF underwent both CDM and electroanatomic voltage mapping during AF and sinus rhythm with multiple pacing protocols. Through the use of a left atrium statistical shape model, the location of distinctive propagation patterns identified by CDM was compared with low-voltage areas (LVAs) and regions of slow conduction velocity (CV). Neither LVA nor CV mapping during paced rhythms reliably identified regions containing CDM propagation patterns. Conduction velocity mapping during AF did correlate with these regions (ρ = -0.63, P < 0.0001 for pivoting patterns; ρ = -0.54, P < 0.0001 for rotational patterns). These propagation patterns consistently occurred in two specific anatomical regions across patients: the anteroseptal and inferoposterior walls of the left atrium. CONCLUSION: Mapping techniques during paced rhythms do not reliably correspond with regions of CDM-identified propagation patterns in persistent AF. However, these propagation patterns are consistently observed in two specific anatomical regions, suggesting a predisposition to abnormal electrophysiological properties. While further research is needed, these regions may serve as promising targets for empirical ablation, potentially reducing the reliance on complex mapping techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharp et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=22). Charge density mapping (CDM) vs. Conventional contact mapping (electroanatomic voltage and conduction velocity mapping) was evaluated on Correlation of CDM-identified propagation patterns with low-voltage areas and slow conduction velocity regions (ρ = -0.63 (pivoting), ρ = -0.54 (rotational), p=<0.0001). Conduction velocity mapping during AF correlated with CDM-identified pivoting (ρ = -0.63, P < 0.0001) and rotational (ρ = -0.54, P < 0.0001) propagation patterns in the left atrium.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: