Why the study?
The spatial relationship between low-voltage areas in bipolar voltage mapping and localized complex conduction-cores identified by global charge-density mapping was unknown.
Does localized complex conduction (LCC) mapping correlate spatially with low-voltage areas (LVAs) identified by bipolar voltage mapping in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Does localized complex conduction (LCC) mapping correlate spatially with low-voltage areas (LVAs) identified by bipolar voltage mapping in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Low-voltage areas identified by bipolar voltage mapping only partially overlap with localized complex conduction cores during persistent AF, suggesting bipolar voltage mapping may be insufficient as a sole surrogate for identifying arrhythmogenic substrates.
Bipolar voltage mapping may miss key substrates in persistent AF; leaves open whether LCC mapping improves ablation targeting.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the spatial relationship between low-voltage areas (LVAs) in bipolar voltage mapping (BVM) and localized complex conduction (LCC)-cores in a global, non-contact, charge-density-based imaging, and mapping system (AcM). METHODS: Patients with history of index PVI for PsAF and scheduled for a repeat ablation procedure for recurrence of the same arrhythmia were enrolled between August 2018 and February 2020. All patients underwent both substrate mappings of the left atrium (LA) with the CARTO 3D map-ping system and with AcM. RESULTS: Ten patients where included in our analysis. All presented with persistency of PVI in all veins at the moment of repeat procedure. There was no linear relationship in BVM maps between SR and CSd (correlation coefficient 0.31 ± 0.15), SR and CSp (0.36 ± 0.12) and CSd and CSp (0.43 ± 0.10). The % overlap of localized irregular activation (LIA), localized rotational activation (LRA) and Focal (F) regions with LVA was lower at 0.2 mV compared to 0.5 mV (4.97 ± 7.39%, 3.27 ± 5.25%, 1.09 ± 1.92% and 12.59 ± 11.81%, 7.8 ± 9.20%, 4.62 ± 5.27%). Sensitivity and specificity are not significantly different when comparing composite maps with different LVA cut-offs. AURC was 0.46, 0.48, and 0.39 for LIA, LRA, and Focal, respectively. CONCLUSION: Due to wave front direction dependency, LVAs mapped with BVM in sinus rhythm and during coronary sinus pacing only partially overlap in patients with PsAF. LCC-cores mapped during PsAF partially co-localize with LVAs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chierchia et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: