Key result
Unipolar voltage mapping detects viable intramural-epicardial atrial myocardium with 93% sensitivity, outperforming bipolar mapping.
Why the study?
Endocardial bipolar voltage amplitude is largely derived from endocardial and subendocardial layers, potentially yielding low bipolar voltage despite viable intramural-epicardial myocardium.
Does endocardial unipolar voltage mapping improve detection of viable intramural-epicardial atrial myocardium compared to bipolar voltage mapping in a swine model?
Does endocardial unipolar voltage mapping improve detection of viable intramural-epicardial atrial myocardium compared to bipolar voltage mapping in a swine model?
Unipolar voltage mapping provides higher sensitivity than bipolar mapping for detecting viable intramural-epicardial myocardium in areas of endocardial scar.
May improve intramural gap detection in ablation; hypothesis-generating in swine, human validation required.
Background: Endocardial bipolar voltage amplitude is largely derived from endocardial and subendocardial wall layers. This may result in situations of low bipolar voltage amplitude despite the presence of mid-myocardial including epicardial (ie, intramural-epicardial) viable myocardium. This study examined the utility of endocardial unipolar voltage mapping for detection of viable intramural-epicardial atrial myocardium. Methods: In 15 swine, an atrial intercaval ablation line with an intentional gap was created. Animals survived for 6 to 8 weeks before electroanatomical mapping followed by sacrifice. Gaps were determined by the presence of electrical conduction and classified based on the histopathologiclly layer(s) of viable myocardium into the following: (1) transmural, (2) endocardial, and (3) intramural-epicardial. Voltage data from healthy, scar, and gap points were exported into excel. The sensitivity and specificity of bipolar and unipolar voltage amplitude to detect intramural-epicardial gaps were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: In 9 of 15 (60%) swine, a focal ablation gap was detected in the intercaval line, while in the remainder 6 of 15 (40%), the line was complete without gaps. Gaps were classified into transmural (n=3), endocardial (n=3), or intramural-epicardial (n=3). Intramural-epicardial gaps were characterized by very low bipolar voltage amplitude that was similar to areas with transmural scar ( P =0.91). In comparison, unipolar voltage amplitude in intramural-epicardial gaps was significantly higher compared to transmural scar ( P <0.001). Unipolar voltage amplitude had higher sensitivity (93% versus 14%, respectively) and similar specificity (95% versus 98%, respectively) to bipolar voltage for detection of intramural-epicardial gaps. Conclusions: Atrial unipolar voltage mapping may be a useful technique for identifying viable intramural-epicardial myocardium in patients with endocardial scar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yavin et al. (2023) studied Atrial ablation gaps (n=15). Endocardial unipolar voltage mapping vs. Endocardial bipolar voltage mapping was evaluated on Sensitivity for detection of intramural-epicardial gaps. Endocardial unipolar voltage mapping had higher sensitivity (93% vs 14%) and similar specificity (95% vs 98%) compared to bipolar mapping for detecting viable intramural-epicardial atrial myocardium.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: