Key result
Genoss paclitaxel-coated balloon proves noninferior to reference PCB for 6-month late lumen loss.
Why the study?
The Genoss paclitaxel-coated balloon uses shellac and vitamin E as excipients to enhance drug delivery, but its angiographic outcomes needed comparison against an established paclitaxel-coated balloon in de novo coronary artery disease.
Does a shellac and vitamin E-based paclitaxel-coated balloon improve 6-month angiographic in-lesion late lumen loss compared to a reference paclitaxel-coated balloon in patients with de novo coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=204)
1:1
Yes
Does a shellac and vitamin E-based paclitaxel-coated balloon improve 6-month angiographic in-lesion late lumen loss compared to a reference paclitaxel-coated balloon in patients with de novo coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.06% vs 0.09%
p-value: p=0.001 for noninferiority
A novel paclitaxel-coated balloon using shellac and vitamin E excipients demonstrated noninferior 6-month angiographic outcomes compared to a standard reference paclitaxel-coated balloon for the treatment of de novo coronary artery disease.
Supports novel shellac/vitamin E PCB as noninferior alternative; extends evidence for paclitaxel-coated balloons in de novo CAD.
The Genoss paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) is a novel PCB with shellac and vitamin E as excipients, enhancing drug delivery to the target lesion and minimizing restenosis. This study aimed to compare quantitative coronary angiographic outcomes at 6 months after treatment of de novo coronary artery disease (CAD) with 2 different types of PCBs. This prospective, multicenter, noninferiority trial randomized 204 patients with chronic coronary syndrome or stabilized acute coronary syndrome to treatment with the shellac and vitamin E-based PCB or the reference PCB (SeQuent Please NEO) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was noninferiority for the 6-month angiographic in-lesion late lumen loss. The 6-month in-lesion late lumen loss was 0.06 ± 0.38 mm with shellac and vitamin E-based PCB vs 0.09 ± 0.36 mm with reference PCB. The 1-sided 97.5% upper confidence limit of the difference was 0.08 mm, which was lower than the noninferiority limit of 0.15 mm, achieving noninferiority ( P for noninferiority = 0.001). There was comparable late lumen enlargement (44.7% vs 42.7%; P = 0.903) and binary restenosis rates (3.2% vs 6.7%; P = 0.442) following treatment with shellac and vitamin E-based PCB and reference PCB, respectively. Both PCBs had similar 12-month rates of target vessel failure (3.0% in shellac and vitamin E-based PCB vs 4.3% in reference PCB; P = 0.921). The Genoss PCB, formulated with shellac and vitamin E as excipients, demonstrated angiographic outcomes comparable to a clinically proven PCB in the treatment of de novo CAD. (Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Coronary De Novo Lesions; NCT05096442 )
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shin et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in de novo coronary artery disease (n=204). Genoss paclitaxel-coated balloon vs. SeQuent Please NEO paclitaxel-coated balloon was evaluated on 6-month angiographic in-lesion late lumen loss (95% CI upper limit 0.08, p=0.001 for noninferiority). The Genoss paclitaxel-coated balloon was noninferior to the reference PCB for 6-month angiographic in-lesion late lumen loss (0.06 vs 0.09 mm; P=0.001 for noninferiority).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: