Key result
OAC discontinuation occurred in 23.6% of AF patients at 1 year, strongly predicted by successful rhythm control in the catheter ablation group (OR 6.61; 95% CI 3.00-14.6; p<0.001).
Why the study?
OAC discontinuation is a concern in AF management, may vary by management strategy, and may be influenced by physician concerns regarding patient satisfaction.
Does OAC discontinuation affect health status in patients with newly recognized atrial fibrillation and CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2?
Observational (n=1,647)
Yes
Does OAC discontinuation affect health status in patients with newly recognized atrial fibrillation and CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2?
OAC discontinuation is common in high-risk AF patients, especially after successful rhythm control, but does not significantly impact patient-reported health status at 1 year.
OAC discontinuation after successful rhythm control does not affect health status; leaves open thromboembolic risks in high-CHA2DS2-VASc AF.
Aims: The discontinuation of oral anticoagulants (OACs) remains as a significant concern in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). The discontinuation rate may vary depending on management strategy, and physicians may also discontinue OACs due to concerns about patient satisfaction with their care. We aimed to assess the incidence of OAC discontinuation and its relationship to patients’ health in an outpatient AF registry. Methods and Results: From a multicenter registry for newly recognized AF patients (n = 3313), we extracted 1647 (49.7%) patients with OACs and a CHA2DS2-Vasc score of ≥2. Discontinuation was defined as sustained cessation of OACs within a 1-year follow-up. We examined predictors associated with discontinuation and its relations to health status defined by the AFEQT questionnaire. Of the 1647 patients, 385 (23.6%) discontinued OACs after 1 year, with discontinuation rates varying across treatment strategies (15.3% for catheter ablation, 4.9% for rhythm control with antiarrhythmic drugs, and 3.0% for rate control). Successful rhythm control was associated with discontinuation in the catheter ablation (OR 6.61, 95% CI 3.00–14.6, p < 0.001) and antiarrhythmic drugs (OR 6.47, 95% CI 2.62–15.9, p < 0.001) groups, whereas the incidence of bleeding events within 1 year was associated with discontinuation in the rate control group. One-year AFEQT scores did not significantly differ between patients who discontinued OACs and those who did not in each treatment strategy group. Conclusions: OAC discontinuation was common among AF patients with significant stroke risk but varied depending on the chosen treatment strategy. This study also found no significant association between OAC discontinuation and patients’ health status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakamaru et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=1,647). Treatment strategies (catheter ablation, rhythm control, rate control) was evaluated on Sustained cessation of OACs within a 1-year follow-up. OAC discontinuation occurred in 23.6% of AF patients at 1 year, strongly predicted by successful rhythm control in the catheter ablation group (OR 6.61; 95% CI 3.00-14.6; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: