In general, the problem is that the computed mean-variance relationship for a period of time cannot be identified in distinction to the effects of shifts in the relationship over time—without additional information or assumptions. Thus, using a mean-variance approach to risk-return relationships means that statements about the nature of the mean-variance association cannot be confirmed in a nontrivial fashion within the empirical system nor generalized to any other time period—including subperiods. (Ruefli 1990) (emphasis in original)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philip Bromiley (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: