Key result
Tissue Doppler imaging shows moderate agreement with pulsed-wave Doppler for measuring MPI in pulmonary hypertension.
Why the study?
MPI measured by conventional pulse-wave Doppler is invariably used to evaluate RV systolic function in PH, prompting assessment of its agreement with tissue Doppler imaging.
Does Myocardial Performance Index measured by tissue Doppler imaging agree with conventional pulsed-wave Doppler in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
Cross-Sectional (n=100)
No
Does Myocardial Performance Index measured by tissue Doppler imaging agree with conventional pulsed-wave Doppler in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
Effect estimate: Mean difference -0.14 (95% CI -0.39 to 0.11)
MPI measured by tissue Doppler imaging shows moderate agreement with conventional pulsed-wave Doppler and correlates significantly with other RV systolic function measures in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
Moderate agreement supports cautious substitution of tissue Doppler MPI in pulmonary hypertension; leaves open prospective validation against outcomes.
Background and aim: Myocardial performance index (MPI) measured by conventional pulse-wave Doppler is invariably used to evaluate right ventricular (RV) systolic function in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). The primary objective of this study was to assess the degree of agreement between MPI measured by conventional pulsed-wave Doppler (PWMPI) and tissue Doppler imaging (TDMPI) in patients with PH. Secondary objective was to correlate MPI measured by these two methods with other RV systolic function related echocardiographic measures. Methods: It was a hospital-based, cross-sectional, observational study involving 100 consecutive patients with PH. Different echocardiographic parameters were used to evaluate RV systolic function. In all patients, conventional pulsed-wave Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging were used as a tool to calculate MPI. Results: Bland-Altman analysis showed moderate agreement between PWMPI and TDMPI (the mean difference was-0.14 at 95% intervals of agreement, absolute difference =-0.39 to 0.11; 95% intervals of agreement, percentage of average =-32.6 to 27.7). We found significant correlation of PWMPI with S'-wave velocity (r=-0.57, p = <0.0001),RVEF (r =-0.245, p = 0.013), RVFAC (r =-0.385, p = 0.0001), RV dp/dt (r =-0.295, p = 0.002), and TAPSE (r =-0.39, p = 0.0001).With regards to TDMPI, we found significant correlation with RVEF (r =-0.527, p = <0.0001),RVFAC (r =-0.53, p = <0.0001),RV dp/dt (r =-0.557, p = <0.0001),TAPSE (r =-0.50, p = <0.0001),and S'-wave velocity (r =-0.583, p = <0.0001).Conclusion: Our findings proved that MPI measured by tissue Doppler is a safe, effective, and accurate method to evaluate global RV function in patients with chronic PH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Venkatesh Reddy Sathi Madhan (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Pulmonary Hypertension (n=100). Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDMPI) vs. Conventional Pulsed-Wave Doppler (PWMPI) was evaluated on Agreement between PWMPI and TDMPI (Mean difference -0.14, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.11). Tissue Doppler imaging demonstrated moderate agreement with conventional pulsed-wave Doppler for measuring myocardial performance index (mean difference -0.14) in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: