Key result
Greater peri-infarct zone extent on CMR is linked to higher all-cause post-MI mortality.
Why the study?
Accurate risk stratification after myocardial infarction is crucial, and the peri-infarct border zone may be an important arrhythmogenic substrate with prognostic value.
Does the extent of the peri-infarct zone measured by contrast-enhanced CMR predict mortality in patients with prior myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=144)
Does the extent of the peri-infarct zone measured by contrast-enhanced CMR predict mortality in patients with prior myocardial infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The extent of the peri-infarct zone measured by contrast-enhanced CMR provides incremental prognostic value for mortality beyond left ventricular ejection fraction and systolic volume index in patients with prior MI.
Background— Accurate risk stratification is crucial for effective treatment planning after myocardial infarction (MI). Previous studies suggest that the peri-infarct border zone may be an important arrhythmogenic substrate. In this pilot study, we tested the hypothesis that the extent of the peri-infarct zone quantified by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is an independent predictor of post-MI mortality. Methods and Results— We studied 144 patients with documented coronary artery disease and abnormal myocardial delayed enhancement (MDE) consistent with MI. A computer-assisted, semiautomatic algorithm quantified the total infarct size and divided it into the core and peri-infarct regions based on signal-intensity thresholds (>3 SDs and 2 to 3 SDs above remote normal myocardium, respectively). The peri-infarct zone was normalized as a percentage of the total infarct size (%MDE periphery ). After a median follow-up of 2.4 years, 29 (20%) patients died. Patients with an above-median %MDE periphery were at higher risk for death compared with those with a below-median %MDE periphery (28% versus 13%, log-rank P <0.01). Multivariable analysis showed that left ventricular systolic volume index and %MDE periphery were the strongest predictors of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for %MDE periphery , 1.45 per 10% increase; P =0.002) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR, 1.51 per 10% increase; P =0.009). Similarly, after adjusting for age and left ventricular ejection fraction, %MDE periphery maintained strong and independent associations with all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 1.42; P =0.005) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR, 1.49; P =0.01). Conclusions— In patients with a prior MI, the extent of the peri-infarct zone characterized by CMR provides incremental prognostic value beyond left ventricular systolic volume index or ejection fraction. Infarct characteristics by CMR may prove to be a unique and valuable noninvasive predictor of post-MI mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2006) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease / Post-myocardial infarction (n=144). Extent of peri-infarct zone (%MDE periphery) by contrast-enhanced CMR vs. Below-median peri-infarct zone was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.45 per 10% increase, p=0.002). The extent of the peri-infarct zone quantified by contrast-enhanced CMR independently predicted all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.45 per 10% increase; P=0.002) in post-MI patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: