Why the study?
Criteria for identifying left atrial low-voltage areas as surrogates for fibrosis are not established, particularly when using omnipolar technology mapping.
Does omnipolar technology mapping correlate with conventional bipolar voltage mapping in patients undergoing de novo ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=17)
Does omnipolar technology mapping correlate with conventional bipolar voltage mapping in patients undergoing de novo ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation?
p-value: p=<.050
Omnipolar technology yields higher voltage measurements than conventional bipolar mapping, requiring threshold adjustments to accurately identify arrhythmogenic substrates in persistent atrial fibrillation.
May require adjusted voltage thresholds for omnipolar mapping in persistent AF; leaves open impact on ablation outcomes.
Background: Left atrial (LA) fibrosis is a key component of arrhythmogenic remodeling in atrial fibrillation (AF). LA low-voltage areas (LVAs) are considered surrogates for fibrosis and novel targets for ablation. However, there are no established criteria for identifying such potential pathogenic areas, particularly when using omnipolar technology (OT) mapping. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between OT and conventional bipolar voltage (BiV) in AF and regular rhythms. Methods: Bipolar and OT mapping was performed in 17 patients undergoing de novo ablation for persistent AF. Mapping was performed in AF and coronary sinus pacing (CSP) at 600 ms. BiV of <0.5 mV was defined as low voltage. Results: < .050). BiV thresholds of 0.5 mV during CSP and 0.3 mV in AF corresponded to an OT voltage of 0.84 mV and 0.40 mV, respectively. Conclusion: The mapping tool and atrial rhythm significantly influence LA voltage and LVA burden for both bipolar and OT mapping. Applying a universal bipolar or OT cutoff for low voltage in AF and sinus rhythm will not accurately reflect the arrhythmogenic substrate. OT yields higher voltage than corresponding bipolar measurements; thus, threshold adjustments are required when using OT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valli et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=17). Omnipolar technology (OT) mapping vs. Conventional bipolar voltage (BiV) mapping was evaluated on Correlation between OT and conventional bipolar voltage in AF and regular rhythms (p=<.050).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: