Why the study?
Are patients with heart failure receiving adequate investigation and optimum treatment in routine practice?
Are patients with heart failure receiving adequate investigation and optimum treatment in routine practice?
A retrospective survey demonstrated significant gaps in the investigation and guideline-directed medical treatment of patients with heart failure in routine clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the referral rates to hospital and level of investigation of patients with heart failure, and to assess whether they are receiving optimum management. DESIGN: A retrospective survey. SETTING: Nottingham Health District. PATIENTS: 505 patients receiving loop diuretic treatment prescribed by their general practitioner. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Referral to hospital as an inpatient or outpatient for assessment of assumed cardiac failure; investigations--electrocardiography, chest radiography, and echocardiography; treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. RESULTS: Only 56% of patients prescribed loop diuretics fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for heart failure. Of these, 74% had been referred to hospital, of whom 80% had had an electrocardiograph, 75% a chest radiograph, but only 31% an echocardiogram. Only 17% of patients with heart failure were being treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in conjunction with loop diuretics. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with heart failure in the Nottingham Health District are not being adequately investigated or receiving the optimum treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clarke et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: