Key result
Watchman device achieves ~96% procedural success for LAA occlusion.
Why the study?
To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and short-term efficacy of Watchman endovascular occlusion of the left atrial appendage in a city hospital setting.
Does endovascular occlusion of the left atrial appendage using the Watchman device provide safe and effective LAA exclusion in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=22)
No
Does endovascular occlusion of the left atrial appendage using the Watchman device provide safe and effective LAA exclusion in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation?
Watchman LAA occlusion is feasible and effective in a city hospital setting for high-risk AF patients, achieving a 95.7% procedural success rate.
Supports feasibility of Watchman LAA occlusion in high-risk AF; leaves open confirmation of safety and efficacy in larger trials.
Background . Endovascular occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) using the Watchman device may be considered an adequate alternative to oral anticoagulant (OAC) administration in high-risk patients. Objective . To describe our experience with Watchman endovascular occlusion of the left atrial appendage in a city hospital setting in terms of feasibility and safety, as well as assess the short-term efficacy of this procedure. Design and methods . The study included patients who underwent implantation of the Watchman occlusion device from January 2016 to November 2020. The effectiveness of the procedure was defined as the ability to implant the Watchman without maintaining residual current, safety was defined as the occurrence of nosocomial and 45-day events including stroke, pericardial effusion, major bleeding, and device migration. Results . The study included 22 patients: 10 men and 12 women, who underwent implantation of the Watchman occluding device in the LAA. The indication for implantation was a history of gastrointestinal bleeding in 15 patients, cerebral hemorrhage in 3 patients and low compliance to therapy in 4 patients. The success rate of the procedure was 95.7 %. According to control transesophageal echocardiography, after 45 days LAA was excluded from the bloodstream in 21 of 22 patients. Conclusion . Despite the higher complication rate of occlusion of the LAA compared to drug treatment, the overall mortality from any cause in patients with the implanted Watchman was lower.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guryev et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=22). Watchman endovascular occlusion of the left atrial appendage was evaluated on Procedural success (ability to implant without residual current). Endovascular occlusion of the left atrial appendage using the Watchman device achieved a 95.7% procedural success rate, with successful LAA exclusion in 21 of 22 patients at 45 days.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: