Key result
Watchman and ACP/Amulet LAAC devices linked to annual ischemic stroke rates below ~2%.
Why the study?
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is an alternative treatment for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, but long-term outcomes in Asia were generally unknown.
Does percutaneous left atrial appendage closure prevent stroke and systemic embolization in Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=124)
Does percutaneous left atrial appendage closure prevent stroke and systemic embolization in Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.9% vs 1.4%
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is safe and technically feasible in Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, demonstrating efficacy and adverse event rates similar to Caucasian populations.
Supports LAA closure feasibility in Asian nonvalvular AF; extends Caucasian data but leaves open randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), the left atrial appendage occluder (LAAO) is an alternative treatment for stroke prevention. However, the long-term outcomes in Asia was generally unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective longitudinal study and a total of 124 patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulants or stroke despite under anticoagulants had been enrolled since 2013. Primary efficacy was defined as any type of stroke/systemic embolization and adverse event as any procedure or anti-thrombotic related complications. Twelve patients were excluded due to thrombus in the LAA or oversize LAA. Watchman was successfully implanted in 55 patients (98%) and ACP/Amulet also 55 patients (98%). During follow-up, the ischemic stroke rate was 1.9 in the Watchman and 1.4 per 100 patient-year in the ACP/Amulet group. There were 2 Watchman patients experiencing intracranial hemorrhage. Device-related thrombus (DRT) was noted in 3 patients (2.7%).There was no patient with peri-device lead ≧5 mm. In those patients receiving only local anesthesia, the follow-up echocardiography showed no significant peri-device leak, malposition of LAAO and DRT. CONCLUSION: This long-term follow-up study shows that percutaneous closure of LAA is a safe and technically feasible procedure with satisfactory outcomes in Asia. The procedure success rate, efficacy and adverse event were similar to those reported in the Caucasian populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiu et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=124). Left atrial appendage occluder (Watchman) vs. ACP/Amulet was evaluated on any type of stroke/systemic embolization. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using Watchman or ACP/Amulet devices demonstrated ischemic stroke rates of 1.9 and 1.4 per 100 patient-years, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: