Key result
Ablating outflow tract PVCs predicts ~101% greater odds of LV recovery versus other ventricular origins.
Why the study?
PVC treatment recommendations differ by ventricle of origin, but whether the site of arrhythmia origin determines the success of RFCA required assessment.
Does the origin of ablated premature ventricular contractions (outflow tract vs ventricles) determine the level of left ventricular function improvement and ablation success in patients with monomorphic PVCs?
Cohort (n=110)
Single-blind
No
Does the origin of ablated premature ventricular contractions (outflow tract vs ventricles) determine the level of left ventricular function improvement and ablation success in patients with monomorphic PVCs?
Effect estimate: OR 2.01 (95% CI 1.15-10.75)
p-value: p=0.015
While the origin of PVCs does not affect the success rate of radiofrequency catheter ablation, an outflow tract origin is associated with a greater likelihood of left ventricular function recovery.
OT-origin PVC ablation was associated with greater LV recovery; leaves open whether origin affects outcomes in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are associated with tachycardiomyopathy and high mortality rate. The treatment depends on the engaged ventricle. For PVCs originating from the right outflow tract (OT), radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is recommended (class IB‑R recommendation) in preference to pharmacotherapy. In those originating from the left ventricle, ablation is a class IIa B‑NR recommendation. AIMS: The aim of the study was to assess the success of RFCA of PVCs based on arrhythmia origin. METHODS: A total of 110 consecutive patients with monomorphic PVCs referred for ablation were enrolled and divided according to the site of ablation to the OT group and the ventricles (VENT) group. Holter electrocardiography and echocardiography were performed before the procedure and at 6‑month follow‑up. RESULTS: Long‑term RFCA success was achieved in 93 (85%) patients (89% in the OT group and 82% in the VENT group; P = 0.39). The PVC reduction was similar in both groups (median [interquartile range] 99.55% [14] and 99.88% [6], respectively; P = 0.56). The OT group presented greater left ventricle (LV) recovery than the VENT group (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.15-10.75; P = 0.015). The procedure in the VENT group was longer, required additional access, the complication rate was similar, and 1 serious adverse event (aortic dissection) was observed in a patient with arrhytmia originating in the LV outflow tract. CONCLUSIONS: The origin of PVCs does not determine the success of arrhythmia elimination. The OT origin may predict LV improvement. The duration of RFCA in the VENT group was longer. The outflow tract origin may predict reversal of LV deterioration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wojdyła‐Hordyńska et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic monomorphic premature ventricular contractions (n=110). Radiofrequency catheter ablation of outflow tract (OT) premature ventricular contractions vs. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular (VENT) premature ventricular contractions was evaluated on Left ventricle (LV) recovery (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.15-10.75, p=0.015). Radiofrequency catheter ablation of premature ventricular contractions originating from the outflow tract predicted greater left ventricular recovery compared to ventricular origins (OR 2.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: