Key result
Rivaroxaban plasma concentration correlates with anti-Factor Xa levels but lacks significant genetic associations.
Why the study?
Rivaroxaban exhibits significant interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and bleeding risk that nongenetic factors do not fully explain, and the impact of genetic polymorphisms remains debated.
Do genetic variants affect rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and hemorrhage risk in patients with venous thromboembolism?
Observational (n=310)
No
Do genetic variants affect rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and hemorrhage risk in patients with venous thromboembolism?
Genetic variants may influence rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and bleeding risk in VTE patients, highlighting a potential role for pharmacogenetic monitoring, though larger validation studies are needed.
Anti-FXa levels track rivaroxaban exposure in VTE; leaves open clinically relevant genetic effects after correction.
Background Rivaroxaban is a first‐line agent for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment. However, its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and bleeding risk exhibit significant interindividual variability. Known nongenetic factors alone cannot fully explain this variability, and the impact of genetic polymorphisms remains debated. Methods From December 29, 2021, to May 11, 2023, 310 patients with venous thromboembolism treated with rivaroxaban were enrolled in this observational study from a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China, based on predefined criteria. We assessed relationships between rivaroxaban concentrations, anti‐Factor Xa levels, and coagulation parameters; examined the impact of 12 genes on concentrations and anti‐Factor Xa levels; and followed up for at least 3 months to identify bleeding risk factors. Results Rivaroxaban plasma concentration was significantly related to anti‐Factor Xa levels (R 2 =0.697), activated partial thromboplastin time (R 2 =0.134), prothrombin time (R 2 =0.123), and international normalized ratio (R 2 =0.116). Peak concentrations were associated with cytochrome p450 3A5 (rs776746, P =0.023), sushi domain‐containing protein 3 ( rs76292544, P =0.034), and ATP‐binding cassette subfamily G member 2 ( rs1045642, P =0.012); trough concentrations were linked to cytochrome p450 3A5 (rs776746, P =0.045), sushi domain‐containing protein 3 (rs76292544, P =0.014), and ATP‐binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (rs2231142, P =0.029); peak anti‐Factor Xa levels were associated with aldo‐keto reductase family 7 member A3 (rs1738023, P =0.022; rs1738025, P =0.035) and ATP‐binding cassette subfamily A member 6 (rs7212506, P =0.044). However, these genetic associations were not significant after Bonferroni correction. Hemorrhage risk factors were anemia, pulmonary embolism, and the TT genotype of sushi domain‐containing protein 3 (rs76292544). Conclusions Pharmacogenetic monitoring and hemorrhage risk assessment may contribute to optimize its efficacy and safety. Larger‐scale, global multicenter clinical trials are required to validate the potential gene loci for testing, including cytochrome p450 3A5 (rs776746), sushi domain‐containing protein 3 (rs76292544), ATP‐binding cassette transporter B1 (rs1045642), and ATP‐binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (rs2231124), with particular focus on sushi domain‐containing protein 3 (rs76292544).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Venous thromboembolism (n=310). Rivaroxaban was evaluated on Relationships between rivaroxaban concentrations, anti-Factor Xa levels, coagulation parameters, and genetic polymorphisms. Rivaroxaban plasma concentration significantly correlated with anti-Factor Xa levels (R2=0.697), while genetic associations with drug concentrations lost significance after Bonferroni correction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: