Key result
Real-world RSV vaccine effectiveness estimates closely align with measured reductions in UK hospitalizations.
Why the study?
It was unknown how reported UK population-level reductions in RSV hospitalizations relate to real-world bivalent RSVpreF vaccine effectiveness estimates from the first post-implementation season.
Does bivalent RSVpreF vaccine reduce RSV-related hospitalizations in older adults at the population level consistent with expected vaccine effectiveness estimates?
Does bivalent RSVpreF vaccine reduce RSV-related hospitalizations in older adults at the population level consistent with expected vaccine effectiveness estimates?
Population-level reductions in RSV hospitalizations following bivalent RSVpreF implementation in the UK align closely with expected impacts calculated from real-world vaccine effectiveness studies.
RSVpreF yields expected population reductions in RSV hospitalizations; supports VE estimates but leaves open need for prospective confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is an important cause of hospitalizations among adults. Following bivalent respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F (RSVpreF) vaccine licensure and implementation, two studies have documented population-level reductions in RSV hospitalizations in the United Kingdom (UK), ranging from 30% to 62% in England and Scotland, respectively. Separately, vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies have been conducted in a number of settings. The question arises: Is there a relationship between these population-level reductions in RSV hospitalizations and real-world VE estimates from the first season post-implementation of bivalent RSVpreF, and do the impact findings reflect what would be expected from the VE estimates? METHODS: Publicly available estimates for end-of-season-1 (EOS1) bivalent RSVpreF VE against RSV-related hospitalization were identified. Using these VE estimates, the expected vaccine impact across all potential vaccine coverage values was calculated using the formula impact = VE * uptake. We additionally estimated expected VE based on the impact findings from the RDD analyses. RESULTS: Six real-world studies evaluating bivalent RSVpreF VE were identified from the United States, UK, and Denmark; they documented 67-91% bivalent RSVpreF VE against RSV-related hospitalizations. Calculated impact using these six VE estimates closely aligned with the measured results estimated from the UK analyses. VEs calculated in turn from impact estimates ranged from 91% [Scotland] to 76% [England], closely aligning with expected results. CONCLUSIONS: These early results indicate that the extent of expected population-level impact achieved can be reliably predicted from VE studies and national coverage data. Bivalent RSVpreF use can have a substantial public health and economic impact by reducing RSV-related hospitalizations, as seen in this initial UK vaccination program. Protection of older adults from severe RSV disease is off to a promising start and implementation efforts to boost vaccine uptake should be a priority for health care workers, public health practitioners, and policymakers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aliabadi et al. (2025) conducted a review in Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) hospitalization. Bivalent RSVpreF vaccine vs. No vaccine was evaluated on Population-level impact on RSV hospitalizations. Calculated population-level impact using six real-world vaccine effectiveness estimates closely aligned with measured reductions in RSV hospitalizations from UK analyses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: