Why the study?
Most current electrocardiogram human identification research focuses only on resting conditions, leaving performance during exercise unclear.
Do existing learning methods provide satisfying ECG human identification performance under exercise situations compared to rest situations?
Do existing learning methods provide satisfying ECG human identification performance under exercise situations compared to rest situations?
Existing ECG identification methods are deficient when applied to exercise situations, highlighting the need for improved algorithms for biometric security.
ECG biometrics unreliable during exercise; leaves open need for exercise-specific algorithms.
As the advancement of information security, human recognition as its core technology, has absorbed an increasing amount of attention in the past few years. A myriad of biometric features including fingerprint, face, iris, have been applied to security systems, which are occasionally considered vulnerable to forgery and spoofing attacks. Due to the difficulty of being fabricated, electrocardiogram (ECG) has attracted much attention. Though many works have shown the excellent human identification provided by ECG, most current ECG human identification (ECGID) researches only focus on rest situation. In this manuscript, we overcome the oversimplification of previous researches and evaluate the performance under both exercise and rest situations, especially the influence of exercise on ECGID. By applying various existing learning methods to our ECG dataset, we find that current methods which can well support the identification of individuals under rests, do not suffice to present satisfying ECGID performance under exercise situations, therefore exposing the deficiency of existing ECG identification methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: