Key result
PLSVC isolation after PVI for provoked triggers yields similar sinus rhythm success to PVI alone.
Why the study?
Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) can harbor critical non-pulmonary vein foci for atrial fibrillation recurrence, but the effectiveness of provoking AF triggers from PLSVC remains unclear.
Does provocation-guided PLSVC isolation improve or maintain the success rate for maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF and PLSVC?
Cohort (n=37)
Yes
Does provocation-guided PLSVC isolation improve or maintain the success rate for maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF and PLSVC?
Provocation of arrhythmogenic triggers using isoproterenol effectively guides the decision to perform PLSVC isolation in AF patients, avoiding unnecessary ablation when triggers are absent without compromising long-term sinus rhythm maintenance.
Supports avoiding PLSVC isolation absent provoked triggers to prevent unnecessary ablation; leaves open randomized confirmation of this strategy.
BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF), non-PV foci play a crucial role in AF recurrence. Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) has been reported as critical non-PV foci. However, the effectiveness of provocation of AF triggers from PLSVC remains unclear. This study was designed to validate the usefulness of provoking AF triggers from PLSVC. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 37 patients with AF and PLSVC. To provoke triggers, AF was cardioverted, and re-initiation of AF was monitored under high-dose isoproterenol infusion. The patients were divided into two groups: those whose PLSVC had arrhythmogenic triggers initiating AF (Group A) and those whose PLSVC did not have triggers (Group B). Group A underwent isolation of PLSVC after PVI. Group B received PVI only. RESULTS: Group A had 14 patients, whereas Group B had 23 patients. After a 3-year follow-up, no difference in the success rate for maintaining sinus rhythm was observed between the two groups. Group A was significantly younger and had lower CHADS2-VASc scores than Group B. CONCLUSIONS: The provocation of arrhythmogenic triggers from PLSVC was effective for the ablation strategy. PLSVC electrical isolation would not be necessary if arrhythmogenic triggers are not provoked.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Minami et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and persistent left superior vena cava (n=37). Isolation of PLSVC after PVI vs. PVI only was evaluated on Success rate for maintaining sinus rhythm. PLSVC isolation after PVI in patients with provoked triggers yielded similar 3-year success rates for maintaining sinus rhythm compared to PVI alone in patients without provoked triggers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: