Key result
Manual dragging laser irradiation linked to ~50 minutes shorter PVI versus point-by-point technique.
Why the study?
Although laser balloon ablation for AF is highly effective, the conventional point-by-point technique requires a long procedure time.
Does a manual dragging laser irradiation technique reduce procedure time compared to a point-by-point technique in patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI?
Observational (n=51)
No
Does a manual dragging laser irradiation technique reduce procedure time compared to a point-by-point technique in patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI?
The manual dragging laser irradiation technique significantly shortens pulmonary vein isolation procedure time compared to the conventional point-by-point method without compromising safety or efficacy.
Background Although high efficacy of laser balloon (LB) ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been shown, the conventional point‐by‐point technique requires a long procedure time. We investigated the clinical effectiveness of the manual dragging laser technique. Methods We enrolled 51 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using first‐generation LB (LB1) at our institution. The first 25 patients underwent PVI using a point‐by‐point laser irradiation maneuver (point‐by‐point group). The latter 26 patients underwent PVI using a manually dragging laser irradiation maneuver (dragging group). The power and delivery time for the laser energy were selected from a preset protocol with 5.5–12 W and 20–30 s for each application. The dragging irradiation method was performed by manually rotating approximately 1.5°/s during one irradiation application. Results PVI was successful in all cases. The duration of PVI was shorter (66 ± 20 vs. 116 ± 39 min, p < 0.0001), and the number of laser irradiations for the 4PVs were significantly less in the dragging group. There were four recurrent cases (16%) in the point‐by‐point group and 1 (4%) in the dragging group. There was no significant difference in the survival rate free from recurrence after the blanking period between the two groups (log‐rank p = 0.1570). The complications were similar between the groups (4% vs. 4%, ns). Conclusions The manual dragging laser irradiation technique using LB1 could shorten the PVI procedure time while preserving clinical effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sasaki et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=51). Manual dragging laser irradiation technique vs. Conventional point-by-point laser irradiation technique was evaluated on Duration of pulmonary vein isolation (minutes) (p=<0.0001). The manual dragging laser irradiation technique significantly reduced the duration of pulmonary vein isolation compared to the point-by-point technique (66 vs 116 minutes) while preserving clinical effectiveness.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: