Key result
Discharge OAC linked to ~348% greater odds of 90-day functional recovery post-EVT in AF.
Why the study?
The impact of early oral anticoagulant initiation at hospital discharge on functional and safety outcomes in atrial fibrillation-related acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular therapy was evaluated.
Does early oral anticoagulant initiation at hospital discharge improve functional outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular therapy?
Cohort (n=296)
No
Does early oral anticoagulant initiation at hospital discharge improve functional outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular therapy?
Effect estimate: OR 4.478 (95% CI 1.122-17.874)
Absolute Event Rate: 60.18% vs 25.14%
p-value: p=0.034
In AF patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing EVT, early OAC initiation at discharge is associated with improved functional recovery and lower mortality without increasing safety risks.
Should not yet change practice in post-EVT AF stroke; leaves open whether early OAC improves recovery pending RCTs.
Objective This study evaluates the impact of early oral anticoagulant (OAC) initiation at hospital discharge on functional and safety outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF)-related acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT). Methods AF patients undergoing EVT of symptom onset in AIS were included in this study. Patients were grouped by postoperative anticoagulation status. The patients were regularly followed up 90 days and 1 year after discharge. The primary outcome measure for assessing prognosis is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The secondary evaluation indicators were the occurrence of recurrent ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE) outcomes, safety outcomes, and all-cause mortality outcomes within 1 year. The differences in prognostic indicators between the two groups were compared by combining PSM. Results Among the 296 eligible patients, 113 (38.18%) received anticoagulation at discharge, while 183 (61.82%) did not. Before PSM, the anticoagulation cohort exhibited markedly elevated rates of favorable functional outcomes at 90 days post-discharge (mRS 0–2: 60.18% vs. 25.14%, P < 0.001) and at 1 year (mRS 0–2: 64.60% vs. 30.05%, P < 0.001), along with a lower all-cause mortality rate within 1 year (16.81% vs. 44.26%, P < 0.001). After PSM, the results demonstrated that the anticoagulation group had elevated rates of favorable functional outcomes at 90 days (55.81% vs. 27.91%, P < 0.001) and at 1 year (60.47% vs. 30.23%, P < 0.001). The anticoagulation group had a lower all-cause mortality rate at both 90-day (11.63% vs. 40.70%, P < 0.001) and 1-year follow-up (17.44% vs. 50%, P < 0.001). Statistical analysis revealed no significant intergroup differences in terms of IS/SE recurrence rates, safety outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression modeling identified OAC therapy upon discharge as an independent predictor of improved 90-days (OR = 4.478, 95% CI: 1.122–17.874, P = 0.034) and 1 year (OR = 4.168, 95% CI: 1.118–5.542, P = 0.033) functional recovery among patients. Conclusion In patients with AF complicated by stroke who underwent EVT and were at no high risk for severe bleeding, OAC therapy is associated with improved functional and mortality outcomes compared with those not receiving OAC. The benefit remained statistically significant following PSM to adjust for intergroup disparities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation-related acute ischemic stroke (n=296). Oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy at discharge vs. No OAC therapy at discharge was evaluated on Favorable functional outcomes at 90 days (mRS 0-2) (OR 4.478, 95% CI 1.122-17.874, p=0.034). Oral anticoagulant therapy at discharge significantly improved 90-day functional recovery (OR 4.478) in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: