Background Aberrant vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)–driven angiogenesis is central to the establishment and persistence of endometriosis. Although numerous anti-angiogenic compounds have been tested, evidence remains fragmented, and no comparative framework guides the selection of agents compatible with fertility preservation. Objective To identify and rank vascular-targeted pharmacotherapies that most effectively regress endometriotic lesions and could be prioritised for fertility-sparing clinical translation. Methods We conducted a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD420251082905) of controlled studies evaluating VEGF-directed agents in endometriosis. Six databases and two trial registries were searched from inception to 28 July 2025. Thirty-one studies met inclusion criteria (five early-phase human trials, six patient-derived cell models, two baboon experiments, and 18 rodent experiments) investigating 23 pharmacological agents. Primary outcomes were lesion area, lesion number, and VEGF expression; secondary outcomes included microvascular density, endometrial cell proliferation, and apoptosis. Random-effects pairwise and network models (R 4.3 “netmeta”) generated standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs and SUCRA rankings. Transitivity, heterogeneity ( τ 2 , I 2 ), and inconsistency were formally assessed. Drug–gene target intersections across six cheminformatic databases mapped mechanistic convergence. Results Curcumin achieved the greatest lesion-size reduction (SMD = −1.08, 95% CI = −1.38 to −0.79) and the steepest fall in microvascular density (−16%), while cetrorelix most effectively reduced lesion number (SMD = −0.78, 95% CI = −1.36 to −0.20). Retinoic acid and bevacizumab halved VEGF expression. Global inconsistency was non-significant ( P > 0.18) and heterogeneity moderate ( I 2 ≤ 65%). A network analysis identified a 16-gene hub ( CASP3 , MAPK1/3 , AKT1 , STAT3 , etc.) underpinning effective drugs; curcumin targeted 14 of these nodes. Limitations Fifty-eight per cent of the data derived from rodent models revealed that these models do not menstruate and incompletely recapitulate human endometriosis. Most experiments reported short-term surrogate outcomes and rarely measured pain, fertility, or quality of life. Risk of bias was frequently moderate to high, and therefore, small-study or publication bias cannot be excluded. Conclusion This study provides the first, exploratory comparative synthesis of VEGF-directed pharmacotherapies for endometriosis across pre-clinical and early-phase human models. Apparent efficacy rankings, including the high placement of curcumin, should be interpreted as relative signals within a limited and biased dataset rather than as evidence of inherent biological superiority or clinical readiness. These findings are best viewed as hypothesis-generating and may assist in prioritising agents for more rigorous translational and clinical research, rather than supporting specific treatment recommendations. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO CRD420251082905.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hammond et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: